![wxtoimg map overlay wrong wxtoimg map overlay wrong](https://i.redd.it/jlfnxffob1u71.jpg)
- Wxtoimg map overlay wrong how to#
- Wxtoimg map overlay wrong drivers#
- Wxtoimg map overlay wrong driver#
Image and container layers on-diskĪfter downloading a five-layer image using docker pull ubuntu, you can see ThisĬapability provides better performance for layer-related Docker commands suchĪs docker build and docker commit, and consumes fewer inodes on the backingįilesystem.
Wxtoimg map overlay wrong driver#
The overlay2 driver natively supports up to 128 lower OverlayFS layers. OverlayFS refers to the lower directoryĪs lowerdir and the upper directory a upperdir.
![wxtoimg map overlay wrong wxtoimg map overlay wrong](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4wXjsCvHKI0/maxresdefault.jpg)
These directories are called layers and the unification OverlayFS layers two directories on a single Linux host and presents them asĪ single directory. If you are still using the overlay driver rather than overlay2, see Its compatibility with different backing filesystems. Need to use the legacy overlay driver, specify it instead.ĭocker is now using the overlay2 storage driver and has automaticallyĬreated the overlay mount with the required lowerdir, upperdir, merged,Ĭontinue reading for details about how OverlayFS works within your DockerĬontainers, as well as performance advice and information about limitations of
Wxtoimg map overlay wrong how to#
The steps below outline how to configure the overlay2 storage driver. For the overlay2 driver, the version of your kernel mustīefore following this procedure, you must first meet all the Running version 3.18 of the Linux kernel (preferably newer) with the overlay To configure Docker to use the overlay storage driver your Docker host must be It is highly recommended that you use the overlay2 driver if possible, rather So that you do not need to re-create them later.Ĭonfigure Docker with the overlay or overlay2 storage driver Push them to Docker Hub or a private registry before changing the storage driver, Use docker save to save any images you have built or
Wxtoimg map overlay wrong drivers#
The overlay and overlay2 drivers are supported on xfs backing filesystems, To use the overlay driver, which is not recommended. Version 3.10.0-514 of the kernel or higher. Version 4.0 or higher of the Linux kernel, or RHEL or CentOS using.OverlayFS is the recommended storage driver, and supported if you meet the following Note: For fuse-overlayfs driver, check Rootless mode documentation. Or RHEL or CentOS using version 3.10.0-514 and above.įor more information about differences between overlay vs overlay2, check To use the new driver, you need version 4.0 or higher of the Linux kernel, Overlay driver, because it is more efficient in terms of inode utilization. Note: If you use OverlayFS, use the overlay2 driver rather than the This topic refers to the Linux kernel driver as OverlayFS and to the Docker OverlayFS: the original overlay, and the newer and more stable overlay2.
![wxtoimg map overlay wrong wxtoimg map overlay wrong](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/46231794/104772539-e2089180-5773-11eb-809e-b1600554d93d.jpg)
My theory is that slightly different values are needed for each satellite (NOAA 15, 18, 19) and also depending if the pass was south to north and north to south.OverlayFS is a modern union filesystem that is similar to AUFS, but fasterĪnd with a simpler implementation.
![wxtoimg map overlay wrong wxtoimg map overlay wrong](https://community.libre.space/uploads/default/original/2X/e/e40f8529cbdb8473d3315c0b14b7b90baecdfe61.jpeg)
The yaw correction needed can be different depending on the image, so I'm not sure on how to correct it. This is the result if I play with the "Yaw correction" value on the GUI. I guess that the satellites have a slight yaw rotation but I'm not sure. The biggest problem is the slant, where the left part of the image is too high and the right part too low, or vice-versa. The calculations I do are approximate and can be wrong, but I think it is accurate enough. This is mostly ok but I think a different value for each satellite is needed. The horizontal scale was guessed using values taken from Alexander-Barth/APTDecoder.jl. The satellite position predictions are accurate so this is ok. The vertical scale of the map is calculated by looking at how much the satellite moves over time. The satellite position predictions are accurate enough, there are automated tests to check against. I'm having problems to make the map overlay completely accurate.